Guaranty Trust Holding Company (GTCO) recorded the lowest Loan-to-Deposit Ratio (LDR) among major Nigerian banks in the first quarter of 2026 at just 24%, a clear signal of its low propensity to lend to the real economy as lenders increasingly dodge real-sector credit risks.
LDR comparison across top banks (Q1 2026)
| Bank | LDR (%) |
|---|---|
| Fidelity Bank | 63.0 |
| Stanbic IBTC Holdings | 60.7 |
| Wema Bank | 54.7 |
| FirstHoldCo Plc | 51.3 |
| Sterling Bank | 49.1 |
| Zenith Bank | 46.5 |
| Access Holdings | 38.7 |
| United Bank for Africa (UBA) | 29.6 |
| Guaranty Trust Holding Company (GTCO) | 24.0 |
Source: MoneyCentral
What LDR measures
The Loan-to-Deposit Ratio acts as a primary financial barometer, revealing how much of a bank’s mobilized customer savings is actively pumped into the real economy via credit creation versus how much is locked safely away in treasury reserves.
It is a core financial metric used to evaluate a bank’s liquidity and lending risk by comparing its total outstanding loans to its total customer deposits.
A high LDR can increase interest income but may pose liquidity risks, while a low LDR can ensure safety but limit income opportunities. The ratio reveals whether a bank is managing its core funds prudently or taking on too much risk to boost profits.
The Risk Divide: Defensive Giants vs. Yield Aggressors
The current macroeconomic landscape in Nigeria, characterized by a hawkish 26.5% Central Bank Monetary Policy Rate (MPR), has driven a sharp divide through the banking sector. While mid-tier players are aggressively expanding credit to capture wider net interest margins, GTCO has retreated into a defensive posture.
GTCO’s 24% LDR stands in stark contrast to Fidelity Bank’s 63%, Stanbic IBTC’s 60.7% and Wema Bank’s 54.7%, reflecting fundamentally different risk appetites among Nigerian lenders. While Fidelity and Stanbic IBTC are aggressively deploying deposits into loans to maximize interest income, GTCO is prioritizing capital preservation and risk-free yields from government securities.
The strategy makes sense in Nigeria’s current environment, where real-sector credit risk is elevated due to economic uncertainty, inflation pressures and currency volatility. By holding over 35% of its balance sheet in cash and sovereign instruments, GTCO is capturing double-digit risk-free returns without exposing itself to private-sector loan defaults.
However, this defensive posture comes at a cost. It means less credit flowing to businesses and consumers, potentially constraining economic growth. GTCO’s approach may be optimal for shareholders seeking stability, but it raises questions about banks’ role in financing Nigeria’s economic development.
GTCO’s defensive strategy: How Sustainable?
GTCO continues to show zero propensity to lend to volatile real-sector operators. Instead of taking on private-sector default risks, the bank has built a bulletproof defensive moat—parking over 35% of its entire ₦18.75 trillion balance sheet in pure cash, central bank reserves and short-term sovereign treasury bills to harvest safe, double-digit risk-free yields.
However, when the country’s second most valuable banking franchise chooses to act as luxury storage vaults for risk-free government paper rather than engines for private sector growth, real-sector businesses face a severe credit squeeze.
As traditional bank credit tightens, agile fintech competitors like Moniepoint (currently processing $22 billion monthly) and disbursing over ₦1 trillion in credit to thousands of businesses are rapidly stepping into the void.
These tech platforms are utilizing real-time merchant transaction data to automatically underwrite micro-business loans, gradually siphoning off the cheap, low-cost retail deposit float that traditional lenders have relied upon for decades to keep their funding costs minimal.
That could come back to bite GTCO which only managed to grow deposits by 5.2% in Q1, 2026, compared to December 2025 levels.



