The Nigerian oil and gas sector is currently caught in a valuation tug-of-war. While Aradel Holdings, Seplat Energy, and Oando are riding a wave of investor optimism fueled by the Iran War, a deep dive into their balance sheets reveals a troubling trend: they are struggling to convert high oil prices into actual cash for shareholders.
This is because Seplat Energy Plc, Aradel Holdings Plc, and Oando Plc recorded free cash flow yield (FCFY) of 0.23 percent, 0.9 percent, and -0.45 percent according to MoneyCentral calculations.
The low FCFY means these firms are overvalued, and more importantly not generating enough cash to easily satisfy their debt and other obligations, including dividend payouts even as Seplat Energy sits on a cash of N1.25 trillion ($898.7m).
Free Cash Flow (FCF) Yield is a financial valuation ratio that measures a company’s performance by comparing its free cash flow per share to its market price per share, or total FCF to market cap.
It indicates the cash return an investor gets relative to the stock price, with higher percentages generally signaling undervalued companies and better financial health.
Interpretation: A higher FCF yield means the company is churning out more cash relative to its stock price, potentially indicating a bargain.
Good Yield Thresholds: A yield above 4 percent is typically considered acceptable, while yields above 7 percent are often considered high-ranking for further research.
What it Measures: It shows a company’s ability to pay dividends, buy back shares, and reduce debt.
Comparison Tool: It is best used to compare companies within the same industry.
The FCFY Deficit: Why the “Gains” Feel Hollow
While stock prices are surging, the actual cash return to investors is lagging well below the 4% “good health” threshold. A low or negative FCFY suggests that a company is spending heavily on infrastructure or debt servicing, leaving little for dividends.
| Company | YTD Stock Return | Free Cash Flow Yield (FCFY) | Investment Signal |
| Aradel Holdings | +88.86% | 0.90% | Overvalued; high Capex focus. |
| Seplat Energy | +55.86% | 0.23% | “Cash Rich” but Yield Poor. |
| Oando Plc | +1.11% | -0.45% | Technically Insolvent; Negative Yield. |
Source: MoneyCentral Research
-
Seplat’s Paradox: Despite sitting on a massive cash pile of ₦1.25 trillion ($898.7m), its yield remains near zero. This is largely due to aggressive Capital Expenditure (Capex), which hit $266.8 million in 2025. Investors are essentially funding the “next barrel” rather than receiving a “current check.”
-
Oando’s Insolvency: The firm is currently in a precarious state with total liabilities (₦7.25tn) exceeding total assets (₦6.70tn), resulting in a negative shareholders’ fund of ₦553.82 billion.
The Bull Case: Geopolitics and the AI Electricity Surge
Despite the poor cash yields, the market remains bullish on these tickers for two external reasons:
-
The “Hormuz” Premium: As the Middle East conflict lingers, global buyers are rotating away from Persian Gulf crude and toward Atlantic Basin producers like Nigeria. This “War Hedge” is driving Aradel and Seplat to outperform the NGXASI index (29.35%). Leading the charge is Aradel which has returned 88.86 percent year to date (YTD), while Seplat has gained 55.86 percent, both outperforming the NGXASI index. However, Onado has rallied 1.11 percent, making it the worst oil and gas stock.
-
The AI Power Demand: Data centers driving the Artificial Intelligence revolution require unprecedented amounts of electricity and natural gas. As energy infrastructure firms become the “backbone” of the AI boom, Seplat and Aradel are being re-rated by investors as “Utility-Tech” plays rather than just traditional drillers.
The Capital Discipline Challenge
Analysts warn that for this rally to be sustainable, firms must pivot from “growth at all costs” to “capital discipline.”
-
Capex Overstretch: Seplat’s 2025 Capex was marginally below its $270m–$290m guidance but still significantly higher than the 2024 spend.
-
Shareholder Priority: There is a growing demand for these firms to prioritize balance sheet health and dividend payouts over speculative drilling projects, especially given the high cost of debt in a 26.5% interest rate environment.



