30.8 C
Lagos
Saturday, October 17, 2026

Court Hands UBA Major Victory in Landmark N156bn Debt Recovery Judgement Against The Vaswani Brothers and Stallion Group

Must read

Bala Augie
Bala Augiehttps://moneycentral.com.ng
Bala is the Editor of MoneyCentral Media. Bala is a Fellow (FCA) of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Nigeria (ICAN) and holds a Bsc in Accounting from the University of Abuja. Bala has over 12 years’ experience in the financial journalism landscape with specialization in the Insurance, markets and Finance sectors.
spot_imgspot_img
- Advertisement -

…Stallion Win Adds Momentum to UBA’s Corporate Debt Drive as WEMPCO Case Advances

United Bank for Africa Plc (UBA) has won a court judgment in its loan recovery action against Stallion Group and the Vaswani brothers who control it. The Federal High Court upheld the bank’s receiver, its mortgage security and the liability of the guarantors.

The court case is part of UBA’s aggressive drive to recover loans from defaulters and chronic debtors, and the Stallion judgment is a milestone in that effort.

Justice Daniel Osiagor of the Federal High Court in Ikoyi, Lagos, resolved every issue in UBA’s favour and granted all the reliefs sought, MoneyCentral’s reports according to the judgement heard in Court.

The court confirmed Romeo Ese Michael as receiver-manager, with the right to take possession of the mortgaged property and seek protective orders.

It also barred the defendants from diverting payments owed to them by government agencies, thereby reinforcing the Bank’s ability to protect its recovery interests.

The court held that the defendants did not dispute owing money, only the amount, and that a reconciliation of accounts did not cancel the debt.

The Court also dismissed objections raised by the 12th Defendant (Barbedos Ventures Limited), holding that it had failed to establish any proprietary rights over the mortgaged property. Consequently, its consent was not required for the creation of the mortgage, and its objections were rejected.

When UBA filed the suit in October 2023, it claimed N156.03 billion, as being owed.

The case began when Justice Akintayo Aluko granted UBA orders to take over assets of Stallion Nigeria Ltd. and its affiliates in Lagos, Port Harcourt and Kano, and to freeze their funds across Nigerian banks. Stallion’s attempts to lift those orders failed in December 2023. The defendants include Von Automobile Nigeria, Stallion Motors, The Honda Place and director Sunil Vaswani.

The ruling strengthens a principle Nigerian lenders rely on: arguing over how much is owed does not by itself stop a creditor from enforcing its security. UBA is using the same receiver to pursue N61.45 billion linked to Western Metal Products Co.(WEMPCO).

The decision represents a comprehensive victory for UBA, with the Court resolving all issues in the Bank’s favour and granting all the reliefs sought.

The ruling is particularly significant for the enforcement of creditors’ rights in Nigeria, underscoring the legal validity of properly constituted security arrangements and the authority of duly appointed receivers to enforce creditors’ interests.

The judgment marks a major milestone in UBA’s efforts to recover its exposure to Stallion Group and safeguard the interests of the Bank and its stakeholders.

The key highlights of the judgment are as follows:

  • The Federal High Court Ikoyi affirmed its jurisdiction to hear the case.
  • The Judgement was delivered by Justice Daniel Osiagor of Court 6 of Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos
  • The Defendants did not dispute their indebtedness, only the amount owed.
  • The guarantors were held liable.
  • The appointment of the Receiver/Manager was upheld as valid.
  • The Receiver/Manager’s right to take possession of the mortgaged property was affirmed.
  • The Receiver/Manager was held to be entitled to seek protective orders.
  • The Court held that the reconciliation exercise did not negate the indebtedness.
  • The objection of the 12th Defendant (Barbedos Ventures Limited) was dismissed, as it failed to establish any proprietary rights over the mortgaged property. Its consent was therefore not required for the mortgage.
  • The Defendants were restrained from diverting receivables due to them from government agencies.


Get More of our proprietary news and analysis as MoneyCentral is now on WhatsApp Channels 🚀 Follow the MoneyCentral Nigeria channel on WhatsApp: Click here!

- Advertisement -

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

spot_img

Latest article